Alternative Remedy to Cut Prostate Cancer Risk
By ppruel, 24th Feb 2011 | Follow this author
| RSS Feed | Short URL http://nut.bz/1xijvrmk/
Posted in WikinutHealthAlternative Medicine
Aside from scientific treatments and medications for prostate cancer – some doctors and other experts have advice those who have prostate cancer to adapt a way that would help cut prostate cancer risk naturally.
- What is Prostate Cancer
- Masturbation is Part of People’s Sexual Repertoire
- Masturbation can Lower Risk of Prostate Cancer
What is Prostate Cancer
Prostate cancer is a form of cancer that develops in the prostate, a gland in the male reproductive system. The signs and symptoms of prostate cancer are classified as trouble urinating, decreased force in the stream of urine, blood in your urine, blood in your semen, swelling in your legs, discomfort in the pelvic area and bone pain.
Masturbation is Part of People’s Sexual Repertoire
Anthony Smith, the deputy director of the Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society at La Trobe University in Melbourne, was quoted saying, “The research could affect the kind of lifestyle advice doctors give to patients. Masturbation is part of people’s sexual repertoire. If these findings hold up, then it’s perfectly reasonable that men should be encouraged to masturbate.“
Masturbation can Lower Risk of Prostate Cancer
Some scientific studies found that masturbation can lower risk of prostate cancer. It relieves sexual tension. There are no harmful side effects. It will not stunt your growth. Your testicles will not decrease in size. You will not become sterile. You will be better at sex as result and it feels really good. Clears your sinuses and keeps the plumbing flowing and it makes you happy. But the danger being - you may fall in love with yourself!
Hit Wikinut, Write and Get Paid.

Comments
25th Feb 2011 (#)
This is a very helpful article for men. Many thanks.
Reply to this comment
26th Feb 2011 (#)
Thanks Ms. Carol. I appreciated your kind words. Sorry for the delayed reply.
Reply to this comment