Proof that Triond's Detector Could Not Distinguish The Difference Between Original and Duplicate Contents
By ppruel, 21st Dec 2011 | Follow this author
| RSS Feed | Short URL http://nut.bz/3hssrjky/
Posted in WikinutWritingTrue Stories
Early morning today, I wrote an article entitled Pruelpo Shares: Factoidz Changes Its Policy to Attract More Writers. The said article was intended first for Triond because I know Triond will reject duplicated items.
Triond rejected the article
When I finished polishing the article, I immediately submitted it to Triond for consideration and approval but what surprised me, the article was rejected. Their reasons - they spotted it as duplicate contents. How could it be? I originally wrote the article and no other paying sites published it yet.
I checked out the draft
So, I checked out the draft of the article saved on my computer desktop and started investigating the whole piece. In the article contents, I included some links of my previous published articles at Triond with some short justifications especially about my previous short review about Factoidz that was published last February 2011. But the contents of those links were differently written from my latest article that the site has rejected. The rejection of my article is a proof that Triond's detector tool to spot duplicate contents could not really distinguish what original contents are all about.
I felt disappointed
Of course, I honestly telling you that I felt disappointed simply because it is been a long time, I am writing with the site and that I really had that thought believing that Triond has all the capacity and power to see thoroughly the difference between original and duplicated contents.
To compensate my hard works
Now to compensate my hard works writing the article, I offered it simultaneously to Expertscolumn.com with a new title and summary: Factoidz is Promoting Its New Policy to Attract Writers. Anyone who will have the interest to read the article you are welcome there. It is already available to public and to Wikinut after I made some light revision of the article's summary with a new title: Factoidz is Working Hard to Attract More Writers.
If interested to share your awesome articles and other stuff join me at Wikinut. Write, publish and get paid royalties.
To read my previous article visit Cracking The Short Story--Part Seven Description
Comments
21st Dec 2011 (#)
You indicated the reason for rejection as "I originally wrote the article and no other paying sites published it yet" but by that statement you are clearly indication that it was published somewhere else, perhaps a blog.
Triond, like all paid article publishing sites, employ software to check for duplicate content, e.g. copyscape. It is that check that will cause an article to be rejected.
Writing on a similar subject matter to articles written previously will in and of itself not cause rejection.
Reply to this comment
21st Dec 2011 (#)
Interesting to know, Peter...thanks for sharing...
Reply to this comment
25th Dec 2011 (#)
Thank you for your thought dude Peter...Anyway, I had already posted it to other websites including my blog site. It is now OK. Merry Christmas.
Reply to this comment
21st Dec 2011 (#)
Very informative...thanks for sharing...
Reply to this comment
21st Dec 2011 (#)
There were some "old" articles on Wikinut that I've just recently published at Triond with just a change in the title and with essentially intact content, but no rejection.
In fact I was the one who delete some I own I didn't like.
Thanks, Paul.
Reply to this comment
25th Dec 2011 (#)
An author is always an author. There are more places for it...Thanks dude Buzz
Reply to this comment
21st Dec 2011 (#)
Triond sent me an email to write for them again... i already lost momentum.....by the way KAbs, where did you get that ID card?
Reply to this comment
25th Dec 2011 (#)
Good for you Kabs Cowboy. I got this ID card from London after I took up my creative writing course... Merry Christmas.
Reply to this comment
28th Dec 2011 (#)
I like Triond.
Reply to this comment
28th Dec 2011 (#)
Thanks for this information!
Reply to this comment
6th Jan 2012 (#)
Thanks for the information..I thought I was the only one who experienced it..
Reply to this comment