Quantum Metaphysics or The God Experiments

Ian R Thorpe By Ian R Thorpe, 30th Aug 2013 | Follow this author | RSS Feed | Short URL http://nut.bz/kklenw1i/
Posted in Wikinut>Guides>Philosophy>Other

So what if science came up with something that turns upside down everything we thought we knew about the nature of the universe. Well it has, twenty years ago. Quantum entanglements, non - separability, oneness, once it enters the public perception we will suddenly have to see ourselves and our world differently.

The Electric Monk and Quantum Entanglements

A set of scientific experiments carried out in the 1980s changed physicists understanding of the nature of matter fundamentally. It may also, when put into perspective by history, prove to be the greatest advance in religious understanding for many centuries. And it inspired a gobsmackingly brilliant novel from Douglas Adams, the author of Hitch Hiker's Guide To The Galaxy. Though not as side splittingly funny as HHGTG the novel Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency, in which the eponymous central character runs a detective agency whose investigative methods are based on the interconnectedness of all things.One of the most interesting things about the novel for me is the Electric Monk character. An Electric Monk, riding on a horse, wanders through the narrative without ever being relevant to any of the scenes he features in. We learn the Electric Monk is "a labour-saving device, like a dishwasher or a video recorder. Dishwashers washed tedious dishes for you, thus saving you the bother of washing themyourself, video recorders watched tedious television for you, thus saving you the bother of looking at it yourself; Electric Monks believed things for you, thus saving you what was becoming an increasingly onerous task, that of believing all the things the world expected you to believe."
The Electric Monk it is a very clever fictional device and as sophisticated readers of fiction will probably have worked out, is a symbolic representation of the need to suspend disbelief. But enough of my reading tastes, back to Quantum Metaphysics:

Physicists call the phenomenon discovered by the 1982 experiments 'quantum entanglement' , and it refers to the state of two or more particles once they have interacted with one another. From that point, irrespective of time and distance, a correlation will always exist between the particles. What happens to one will in some way not yet understood, affect the other. This is said to hold good even if the particles, having interacted,are blasted to opposite ends of the universe. How this can be known is not clearly explained. This is not surprising as there is no way we can send people to the end of the universe to take observational readings. Quantum states have however been sent to the opposite end of the laboratory.
Being unable to challenge the theory we must accept that it is so. Anyway it's more fun if we do.
The word entanglement is really a misnomer, suggesting as it does a ball of string a kitten has been playing with. Sometimes the term "non-separability" is used to describe the same condition. The apparently semantic difference between these is really very significant. If matter emerged from energy in the singularity as supporters of Big Bang theory maintain, it ought to follow that all the particles of which the universe consists are in that state of correlation. They have not become entangled, but at the fundamental level they have never been - and can never be - separated. The Braminist philosophy of Hindusism and the North European Druids referred to this in earlier times as 'oneness'. There are also oblique references in the Bible, particularly in the non - synoptic Gospel of John. North European Druidic and also I believe American shamanistic tribal belief systems also had a notion of connectedness, that individuals were as much a part of the land as rocks, streams and trees and that our souls are as real, maybe more real, than our physical bodies.
Almost three decades have passed since non-separability was proved by the experiments but the significance of the discovery has not yet permeated the common consciousness. Perhaps it is too radical a concept, too remote from our everyday lives, to make people take notice. When we view it from the spiritual perspective however, everything changes.Once we consider the implications of non separability from the perspective of the Abrahamic religions, Hinduism of Buddhism, or even the more philosophical versions of humanism ( I include paganism in humanism) clearly the oneness of which all matter and energy are part is both the physical body we inhabit and the manifestation of spirit or mind if you prefer, and the means to redemptive action. This being so, then the correlation of all matter must also apply to all spirit. Our separateness is an illusion; the reality is an indivisible unity. As the Baghavad Gita puts it The physical life is an illusion, our true lives are in the divine (God by whatever name.) Jesus says much the same but in the Bible it is phrased more obtusely. I should point out the Gita is not exactly easily accessible for Westerners, I have my own personal translator (she has great legs too.)
I have turned to writing in this vein because after listening to proposals involving the waste of stupendous amount of taxpayers money on pointless research projects that promise to answer the great mysteries of life but make it obvious the people behind the projects don't even understand the question I was appalled not long ago to hear a physicist talking about the importance of exploring the galaxies. Now the nearest galaxy to the one our solar system is part of is, according to accepted estimates, two and a half million light years away. Our fastest spacecraft would take sixty seven million years to get there. There are no new means of propulsion in development that would take our spacecraft anywhere near practical speeds for even interstellar travel.
And yet people asking in all seriousness that we throw monsey at projects that cannot possibly offer any practical benefit.
Similarly the Large Hadron Collider at CERN and its rival project at MIT vaguely promise great benefits yet a few hours reading up on the Higgs Boson should be enough to convince anyoneexcept a true believe in science as a religion that if the theoretical 'God Particle' does exist their chances of identifying it from among all the other electro magnetic hiss released when you start atom bashing are somewhat less than zero or as I have said elsewhere, like looking for a needle in a haystack when you don't know if there is a needle in the haystack and you also don't know what either a needle or a haystack looks like. But why waste time on pointless exercises to amuse the unimaginative, what we already know shows us if we want to explore a universe we have that universe and the means to travel to its furthest limits (cue spooky Outer Limits music) within us.
Are you ready to get into your own personal TARDIS and explore the infinite universe? Don't forget to invite your electric monk aboard.

A Real Monk And An Alternative Reality

The first stage of our quest brings us into contact with a real monk. Teilhard de Chardin, a scientist - cum - theologian was in ahead of the of the game for non - separablity, theorising that both physical and spiritual aspects of our being were different parts of the same thing twenty years before the experiments confirmed it.. In The Future Of Man(published posthumously in 1959), he quoted a little-known version of Christ's central message to mankind: "Love one another, recognising in the heart of each of you the same God who is being born." Chardin went on to observe: "Those words, first spoken two thousand years ago, now begin to reveal themselves as the essential structural law of what we call progress and evolution." <P>(The Tielhard de Chardin website linked is well worth exploring for people who like to play with ideas. You don't have to agree with Tielhard, the page is not evangelical in any way but it does offer philosophical perspectives that will be new to many people.)
Now I am not going to pretend I am in any way Christian, I found that quote while researching a book on existentialism and bookmarked the quotation. It is expiditious for purposes of this article to suspend my opinions about Jesus however. The Hindu and Pagan version of the idea of oneness can for the sake of simplicity be put like this: The oneness is so great that the whole universe is contained within it and yet so small it's whole is contained within the smallest thing.
In Jesus' lifetime a God of love - using the word in the sense of the Greek 'agape' - love of one's immediate family - was a quite alien concept. The people he was addressing were used to a very different deity: the angry, jealous and capricious Jehovah. Believing judgement day to be imminent, they worshipped him to avoid being cast into hell and in the hope of everlasting life.Jehovah had a lot in common with other godheads particularly the Greek Zeus and the Egyptian Ra.

According to de Chardin and followers of his thinking it was inevitable the injunction to "love one another" should have been understood not as recognition of a commonality or oneness but as a means of gaining personal merit although such interpretations of the message were wrong and totally missed the point. Only now, when quantum mechanics has revealed (as yet inconclusive) evidence that all matter is one, that there is no separation between me and my neighbour and some guy who lives on the other side of the world and whom I will never meet, do we have the physical proof of what was really meant.
We live in the era of self. I write of existentialism but ask many intelligent people what existentialism means and if they offer an answer they will probably describe solipsism, the belief that one's mind is the only thing one can truly know exists. Loving, in this very unfamiliar sense of identifying with others, requires us to put aside the sense of self, clearly a very difficult task for people who believe we each create our own reality. The love Jesus asks of his followers, the sense of oneness the Baghavad Gita
(3)
tells us is the only true reality, the Buddhist concept of Anatta does not claim to be an act of virtue. It is simple pragmatism - the only possible path available to us to achieve the self - knowledge and self fulfillment we seek. Not to love others would be to not loving ourselves, and would deny the facts as we now know them. And if each of us is in reality part of a single spirit, can we still sustain our dubious preoccupation with personal salvation? At best it has always smacked of postponed gratification. At worst it can be egotism, reaching its nadir in the perverted belief of the suicide bomber that he is guaranteed immediate admission to paradise.
With new insights through a religion no longer dependent on blind trust in a pristhood, but grounded instead in knowledge, we are offered a higher purpose. Rather than seeing ourselves as separate individuals,we can understand that despite the sneering of those who style themselves realists there is a meaning to life. We are not just chemical accidents but aspects of a beautiful and indivisible whole.
Teilhard saw that each of us has a unique and essential role in the continuation of The One.Please do not assume I believe all of this and am trying to convert you. What I believe is personal but a big part of it is that each must find his or her own way to spiritual enlightenment. Explore the ideas presented here for yourselves, take from them what you will and perhaps check into my pages again because I will be writing more on this topic.
The truth is not out there.
The truth is here.
We are the truth

RELATED POSTS:
The Making And Unmaking Dance (poem)
Philo and Sophia, philosophy and modern life

Tags

Metaphysics, Philosophy, Physics, Science

Meet the author

author avatar Ian R Thorpe
Born Manchester UK, 1948. varied early career from clerk via construction site worker and street trader to I T consultant. Performance poet, broadcaster, fiction writer and essayist on many topics.

Share this page

moderator Steve Kinsman moderated this page.
If you have any complaints about this content, please let us know

Comments

author avatar sukkran
1st Sep 2013 (#)

interesting topic and well explained. good read.

Reply to this comment

author avatar Sivaramakrishnan A
2nd Sep 2013 (#)

Interesting analysis and thoughts, Ian. We cannot prove much through scientific pursuits but we have intuition to tell us we are from the same source and have spark inside to guide and help each other. Our separate physical existence makes us believe we are very different but we are one and the same and we are sadly moving away from nature - siva

Reply to this comment

author avatar Ian R Thorpe
5th Sep 2013 (#)

I agree. When the US politician Donal Rumsfeld talked of unknown unknowns and known unknowns people said he was crazy but I though he did no go far enough. He should have mentioned the unknown knowns, this things we know but don't know we know.

Reply to this comment

author avatar C.D. Moore
9th Oct 2013 (#)

Love when science and spirituality come together as in your writing. Thanks

Reply to this comment

author avatar Ian R Thorpe
10th Oct 2013 (#)

Thank you for reading C.D.
Brian Cox and company are still trying to create a mathematical universe on the model envisaged by Pythagoras 2600 years ago but a lot of new research is pointing towards the universe being a very strange, mysterious and in terms of current thinking,an illogical thing, more akin to Hindu and buddhist mysticism that string theory.

Reply to this comment

Add a comment
Username
Can't login?
Password